Re: opendkim body hash did not verify problem

From: SM <>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:54:08 -0700

At 13:58 24-04-10, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
>So, although IMHO courier should not change the case of the value of
>the CT header field, I'd still vote for changing DKIM (if necessary)
>to have "relaxed" cover the Content-Type field in line with RFC2045.

It would be easy for the OpenDKIM milter to provide a fix for the
header change on signing.

It would be quite an effort to change the DKIM specification. If you
are up to it, you can raise the issue in the DKIM Working Group.

Received on Sat Apr 24 2010 - 22:54:35 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:19:47 PST