Re: opendkim body hash did not verify problem

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 21:03:45 -0700 (PDT)

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, SM wrote:
>> So, although IMHO courier should not change the case of the value of the CT
>> header field, I'd still vote for changing DKIM (if necessary) to have
>> "relaxed" cover the Content-Type field in line with RFC2045.
> It would be easy for the OpenDKIM milter to provide a fix for the header
> change on signing.

Ideally, courier should just feed to libopendkim or opendkim the message
as it wants to send it. That way what get signed and what the verifier
sees will match.

Is this not something that can be handled in courier?
Received on Sun Apr 25 2010 - 04:04:02 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:19:47 PST