RE: Signing problem

From: Steve Jenkins <>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:34:21 -0700

Hey, Jason. I also like using this to test:




[] On Behalf Of Jason Clint
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 3:21 PM
Subject: RE: Signing problem


apparently sendmail is starting to get sick of me:

Oct 26 16:16:03 mail sendmail[6668]: o9QMG3VX006668: from=root, size=26,
class=0, nrcpts=1,
Oct 26 16:16:03 mail sendmail[6669]: o9QMG3SJ006669:
from=<>, size=332, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<>, proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=localhost.localdomain []
Oct 26 16:16:03 mail sendmail[6669]: o9QMG3SJ006669: Milter insert (1):
header: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256;
c=relaxed/simple;\n\; s=mail;
Oct 26 16:16:03 mail sendmail[6668]: o9QMG3VX006668:, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:00,
xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=30026, relay=[] [],
dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (o9QMG3SJ006669 Message accepted for delivery)
Oct 26 16:16:04 mail sendmail[6672]: STARTTLS=client,, version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL,
cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits=256/256
Oct 26 16:16:05 mail sendmail[6672]: o9QMG3SJ006669:
to=<>, ctladdr=<> (0/0),
delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:02, mailer=esmtp, pri=120332, [], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: 451
4.3.2 Please try again later

I will have to check on it in a minute!


Subject: RE: Signing problem
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:17:29 +0000

Just so you know its not whats in the log that bothers me but the response I
get back from which is.......check that, I just
looked at the last log entry and saw this:

We hope this service has been helpful to you.

Authentication System: DomainKeys Identified Mail
   Result: DKIM signature confirmed GOOD
   Description: Signature verified, message arrived intact
   Reporting host:
   More information:
   Sendmail milter:

give me a second while I verify if its right and I didn't just doze off and
dream it started working.

> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:11:27 -0700
> Subject: Re: Signing problem
> From:
> To:
> CC:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Jason Clint <> wrote:
> > Another update, setting the Domain to
> >, gets rid of the other errro:
> > Oct 26 15:07:44 mail opendkim[6446]: o9QL7iJ8006451: no signing domain
> > for `'
> I just wanted to point out that what you are seeing is not an "error",
> it's debug output caused by the "LogWhy" statement being enabled in
> your opendkim configuration.
> Murray, maybe a log identifier to indicate it's debug output and not
> an error would be beneficial. I'm torn though...
> --
> Regards... Todd
> I seek the is only persistence in self-delusion and
> ignorance that does harm. -- Marcus Aurealius
Received on Tue Oct 26 2010 - 22:34:32 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:19:49 PST