RE: Signing problem

From: Jason Clint <>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:35:32 +0000

the only other thing I did was, add to the Domain. Guess that would make sense though since it would go through right, but then wouldn't I be back to my same problem of not being able to send mail as instead of as

Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:30:34 -0700
Subject: RE: Signing problem

Ah, you changed something else. The signature that was added
has a new “d=” value, namely “”. You don’t have a
public key posted for that domain, resulting in the temp-fail.


[] On Behalf Of Jason

Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 3:21 PM



Subject: RE: Signing problem


apparently sendmail is starting to get sick
of me:

Oct 26 16:16:03 mail sendmail[6668]: o9QMG3VX006668: from=root, size=26,
class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<>, relay=root_at_localhost

Oct 26 16:16:03 mail sendmail[6669]: o9QMG3SJ006669:
from=<>, size=332, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<>, proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=localhost.localdomain []

Oct 26 16:16:03 mail sendmail[6669]: o9QMG3SJ006669: Milter insert (1): header:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256;
c=relaxed/simple;\n\; s=mail;

Oct 26 16:16:03 mail sendmail[6668]: o9QMG3VX006668:,
ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=30026,
relay=[] [], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (o9QMG3SJ006669 Message
accepted for delivery)

Oct 26 16:16:04 mail sendmail[6672]: STARTTLS=client,,
version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL, cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits=256/256

Oct 26 16:16:05 mail sendmail[6672]: o9QMG3SJ006669:
to=<>, ctladdr=<>
(0/0), delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:02, mailer=esmtp, pri=120332, [], dsn=4.0.0,
stat=Deferred: 451 4.3.2 Please try again later

I will have to check on it in a minute!




Subject: RE: Signing problem

Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:17:29 +0000

Just so you know its not whats in the log that bothers me but the response I
get back from which is.......check that, I just looked
at the last log entry and saw this:

We hope this service has been helpful to you.

Authentication System: DomainKeys
Identified Mail

DKIM signature confirmed GOOD

Signature verified, message arrived intact

   Reporting host:

   More information:


give me a second while I verify if its right and I didn't just doze off and
dream it started working.

> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:11:27 -0700

> Subject: Re: Signing problem

> From:

> To:

> CC:


> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Jason Clint <>

> > Another update, setting the Domain to

> >, gets rid of the other

> > Oct 26 15:07:44 mail opendkim[6446]: o9QL7iJ8006451: no signing
domain match

> > for `'


> I just wanted to point out that what you are seeing is not an

> it's debug output caused by the "LogWhy" statement being enabled

> your opendkim configuration.


> Murray, maybe a log identifier to indicate it's debug output and not

> an error would be beneficial. I'm torn though...


> --

> Regards... Todd

> I seek the is only persistence in self-delusion and

> ignorance that does harm. -- Marcus Aurealius



Received on Tue Oct 26 2010 - 22:35:49 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:19:49 PST