Re: opendkim getting hardfail with Google

From: Rolf E. Sonneveld <>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:39:04 +0100

Hi, Murray,

On 3/10/11 12:48 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:29 PM
>> To:
>> Subject: RE: opendkim getting hardfail with Google
>> 1) An additional configuration item that contains a list of fields that
>> should be processed using replacement rules; if no list is specified,
>> we can either default to all of them or default only to those we expect
>> to have addresses in them (from, to, cc, bcc, sender, resent-*).
> Until we decide that it's a bad idea (i.e. feedback is still welcome!), I think v2.3.1 will contain this as a new configuration feature to solve the problem. The default will be "all" if no specific list is given.

may I suggest to make 'none' the default to preserve existing behavior
and to minimize the added complexity for sites that will not use this

Received on Thu Mar 10 2011 - 16:37:43 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:20:16 PST