RE: Question for our stats reporting sites

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 19:07:17 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [] On Behalf Of Todd Lyons
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 9:18 AM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Question for our stats reporting sites
> Mine is doing several RBL checks before the spam scanning occurs. Do
> you need more detail about which ones?

Nope. I think your setup is typical. It just means that whatever claims we might make based on the accumulated stats, we have to include the description of the typical system making the report, i.e., that the data are tainted versus an unfiltered stream by things like RBLs and possibly procmail, spamassassin, etc.
Received on Tue May 31 2011 - 02:07:25 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:20:17 PST