Re: Double signing with OpenDKIM

From: J.D. Falk <>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:45:56 -0700

On Aug 12, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Jonathan Casco wrote:

> If the return path is not an option for signing, what other fields would OpenDKIM be able to sign, not including the sender header.

Any header field which appears in the message can be signed, though it's unwise to sign the few fields which are certain to be changed later in the delivery process.

What are you trying to accomplish?

J.D. Falk
the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions
Received on Fri Aug 12 2011 - 20:46:07 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:20:19 PST