Re: v2.9.0 release planning

From: Todd Lyons <>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:48:48 -0700

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <> wrote:
> I'm starting to think about what to include in a 2.9.0 release for the
> summer. There are about five open feature requests that seem like likely
> Are there any FFRs that we might consider for full activation, because
> they've seen use in production and appear to be useful? Here's the current
> list:

These seem like no brainers to me.

FWIW, this is how I build mine, though I doubt I use hardly any of the FFR's

opendkim: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.1
    Compiled with OpenSSL 0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 01 Jul 2008
    SMFI_VERSION 0x1000001
    libmilter version 1.0.1
    Supported signing algorithms:
    Supported canonicalization algorithms:
    Active code options:
    libopendkim 2.8.1: atps diffheaders debug


The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0.
 If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want,
send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine
Received on Wed Apr 10 2013 - 15:48:59 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Apr 10 2013 - 15:54:02 PST