Re: Signing problems with OpenDKIM on Ubuntu

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 07:50:12 -0700 (PDT)

On Sat, 20 Apr 2013, Jim Fenton wrote:
> This is very helpful; I didn't see that option. One thing that isn't
> clear is what happens if both MTA and InternalHosts is specified; is it
> an "or" or an "and" relationship? But it looks like it does the right
> thing already, since the OPERATION section of opendkim(8) says that it
> signs if the submission of the message was authenticated.
> Based on the documentation, I was expecting LogWhy to make logging much
> chattier. But I'm not getting any syslog information at all from
> opendkim when I send one of these message that I think it should be
> signing but isn't.

The OPERATION section says you have to meet specific criteria, which are
(1) ... and (2) (a) ... (b) ... (c) ... or (d). So you have to meet (1)
and then any of the options of (2) for signing to occur. The logging
added by LogWhy are supposed to tell you which test(s) are being satisfied
(or not) in this logic.

Received on Sun Apr 21 2013 - 14:50:35 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Apr 21 2013 - 14:54:02 PST