Re: Disclaimer added post signing

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:03:30 -0800 (PST)

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> so in other words, spf will never being tested in dmarc if dkim pass ?

That depends on the implementation.

> another one is if bodysigning is not performed, can a faker then fake
> signed headers aswell ?

I'm confused by the question. Can you rephrase?

> to the op, you should add disclaimers before signing, eg call
> disclaimers milter before signing milter, problem solved

Ideally, yes.

Received on Mon Feb 10 2014 - 23:03:54 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Feb 10 2014 - 23:09:02 PST